It was the winter of 1924. Lenin had just died, leaving Russia’s communist future
submerged in uncertainty. Russia was now a country with many utopian plans but no leader to carry them out. Shortly after his death, Nadezhda Krupskaia, the widow of Lenin, said:
“We are building socialism … and as long as we are building socialism but have not yet built it, we will also have homeless children.”
The Soviet Union always
struggled to help their citizens have the necessities of life, and its leaders
imprisoned and killed many people in their quest for their utopia. Russia’s communist era can be remembered for
its empty promises, and for the terrible state of the country.
Rationalizations for the deteriorated condition of the Soviet Union took much the same form in the 1920s through the 1970s. Instead of progressing towards the future, the Soviets seemed mired in the past. These
rationalizations were not only internal but, also at the international level.
Outside of the Soviet Union there were mixed feelings about the communist
Soviets. There was and still is nothing fundamentally wrong in wanting a
society of social justice, and equality for all, even if the communist ideology
meant something very different in practice. In addition, “To condemn the Soviet Union too
thoroughly would be to condemn a part of what the Western Left once held dear
as well” (Applebaum). Both of their fundamental ideologies stemmed
from the philosophers Marx and Engels, sympathizers of socialism.


After the collapse of the Soviet Union the borderlands found themselves in a similar situation once again. Applebaum experienced first-hand this change of national identity by speaking to the victims of the conflicts. When children are not able to speak to their own grandparents due to a language barrier she describes it as a clear sign of displaced culture. She blames the region’s turbulent history, at the hands of the “Giants”, for the loss of identity and the loss of memory.
In a similar manner Soviet communism drastically harmed the people of Russia for generations. Applebaum has examined the most notorious of these harms: the Gulag. Gulag: A History (2003) hones in on the vast
network of concentration camps that held millions
of political and criminal prisoners. The first soviet camps were set up in the
aftermath of the Russian Revolution. During this chaotic and violent period in
Russia’s history “a whole society’s set of values was turned on its head,
murder became an accepted part of the struggle” (Applebaum). Lenin
imprisoned thousands of people on the grounds of being too rich or coming from
an aristocratic background. From 1929, the peak of the camps, until 1953, when
Stalin died, the best estimates indicate that eighteen million people passed
through the massive system of camps. The effect of the camps was so deep that
even in the 1980s Ronald Reagan and soviet president Mikhail Gorbachev were
still discussing them. The main goal of this book is to give voice to those
silenced by the violence and injustice. It gives voice to the victims that were
put away in these detention centers due to the simple fact of disagreeing with
the political system that was being imposed on them.
Once Applebaum was visiting the Russian States Archives in Moscow in search for information on the victims of the Gulag. News spread rapidly through the center that an American was asking questions about the Gulag and its many concentration camps. A woman made it a point to seek out Applebaum and set her straight. The woman was by no means rude or angry towards Applebaum for intruding into the subject, but, she wanted to make sure that Applebaum understood a couple of things before attempting to write about the subject. The woman, a former baby nurse who had worked in a children’s home inside one of Stalin’s concentration camps, wanted Applebaum to understand how “clean and orderly the children’s home had been, and to tell her how happy the children had been within its walls.” According to this former nurse, the other nurses and caretakers had “saved” the children from a terrible fate beside their criminal parents (Angel Factories). The criminals in this case were the political prisoners of the Soviet Union. The nurse even showed Applebaum pictures of the children around a colorful Christmas tree. Interestingly, Applebaum noted that the Christmas tree was the only colorful thing in the pictures. The children all had shaved heads and wore the same drab colored gowns, there were no smiles simply a row of little prisoners. This encounter with the former nurse gave Applebaum an insight into Stalin’s two Russias: a Russia of his supporters and a Russia his opponents and enemies.
A question Anne Applebaum has most likelyhad to face in her career is: “What inspired you, an American woman, to uncover the untold stories of those who lived under Soviet communism?” She might answer those who ask such a question, “Did you ever learn about concentration camps in Europe at some point in your school years?” Most people would readily answer “Of course! Who doesn’t know about the Holocaust?” Applebaum would look at them with knowing eyes and say, "Ah, there is the problem"
Gulag: A History is centered precisely on this problem: the lack of knowledge on the subject of the Soviet’s infringement on its citizens’ civil rights. “All would be sickened by the thought of wearing a swastika. [None would object] to wearing a hammer and sickle on T-shirt or hat” (Applebaum). For some reason it has been difficult in the history of the world to come to terms or understand communism. Applebaum says that while most Americans and Western Europeans clearly see Hitler as “evil” they see communism as a set of good ideas gone wrong somehow. After all the communist ideals were “social justice, equality for all” while the Nazis simply advocated racism. What Applebaum is trying to make the general public understand is that the Soviet’s communism was the same type of “evil” nicely decorated and presented to us with good ideals. She touches upon the fact that it was difficult to come to terms with the idea that “we defeated one mass murderer with the help of another” (Applebaum).
Once Applebaum was visiting the Russian States Archives in Moscow in search for information on the victims of the Gulag. News spread rapidly through the center that an American was asking questions about the Gulag and its many concentration camps. A woman made it a point to seek out Applebaum and set her straight. The woman was by no means rude or angry towards Applebaum for intruding into the subject, but, she wanted to make sure that Applebaum understood a couple of things before attempting to write about the subject. The woman, a former baby nurse who had worked in a children’s home inside one of Stalin’s concentration camps, wanted Applebaum to understand how “clean and orderly the children’s home had been, and to tell her how happy the children had been within its walls.” According to this former nurse, the other nurses and caretakers had “saved” the children from a terrible fate beside their criminal parents (Angel Factories). The criminals in this case were the political prisoners of the Soviet Union. The nurse even showed Applebaum pictures of the children around a colorful Christmas tree. Interestingly, Applebaum noted that the Christmas tree was the only colorful thing in the pictures. The children all had shaved heads and wore the same drab colored gowns, there were no smiles simply a row of little prisoners. This encounter with the former nurse gave Applebaum an insight into Stalin’s two Russias: a Russia of his supporters and a Russia his opponents and enemies.
A question Anne Applebaum has most likelyhad to face in her career is: “What inspired you, an American woman, to uncover the untold stories of those who lived under Soviet communism?” She might answer those who ask such a question, “Did you ever learn about concentration camps in Europe at some point in your school years?” Most people would readily answer “Of course! Who doesn’t know about the Holocaust?” Applebaum would look at them with knowing eyes and say, "Ah, there is the problem"
Gulag: A History is centered precisely on this problem: the lack of knowledge on the subject of the Soviet’s infringement on its citizens’ civil rights. “All would be sickened by the thought of wearing a swastika. [None would object] to wearing a hammer and sickle on T-shirt or hat” (Applebaum). For some reason it has been difficult in the history of the world to come to terms or understand communism. Applebaum says that while most Americans and Western Europeans clearly see Hitler as “evil” they see communism as a set of good ideas gone wrong somehow. After all the communist ideals were “social justice, equality for all” while the Nazis simply advocated racism. What Applebaum is trying to make the general public understand is that the Soviet’s communism was the same type of “evil” nicely decorated and presented to us with good ideals. She touches upon the fact that it was difficult to come to terms with the idea that “we defeated one mass murderer with the help of another” (Applebaum).
It
was not only the Western Left, those who favored socialism, and not only the
western communists that attempted to make excuses for the crimes of the Soviet
Union. The Russian Revolution had many similarities in ideology to the French
and American Revolution. After all it seemed Russia was simply in search of independence
and as Applebaum comments “it was harder to condemn a system which sounded, at
least, similar to their own” (Applebaum ). On the other hand, the Western Left
attempted but struggled in the process of condemning soviet crimes. American
Senator Joe McCarthy chose to take a more direct approach of promoting
anti-communism in the US. He is most remembered for his public “trials” of
communist sympathizers. According to Applebaum, McCarthy’s extremist’s methods
of pursuing communists in American public life tarnished the cause of
anti-communism with intolerance.
In
this same book Anne Applebaum makes a direct connection between the communist
threats Americans once felt with the current terrorism threat that we are
living today. She states, “The emergence of new terrorist threats to Western
civilization make the study of the old communist threats to Western
civilization all the more necessary.” (Applebaum). In other words, in order to
be effective in protecting ourselves we must be aware of what we are up
against. Most importantly we have to make sure that the information we are
receiving is the most accurate. As it was seen with Senator Joe McCarthy,
during the United States anti-communist foreign policy era, it was very easy to
go from criticism to intolerance. We must learn from our past mistakes.
In
a recent article, “Bin Laden Killed: for a day or two, we’ll feel like Americans again”, Applebaum magnifies the lack of unity that exists in our
country today. Applebaum portrays the American public as puppets. We celebrate
and cheer when we are called upon to do so, such as after learning of Bin
Laden’s death, and then quickly resort back to our old ways. We lack the facts
of what is occurring around us. According to Applebaum it’s because of this conformity
that we are often left in the dark such as occurred during the Soviet era. We
decided to listen to the false promises of Nadezhda Krupskaia, the widow of Lenin, because it was easy to do.
The New York Sun
has praised Anne Applebaum for doing what no other Westerner had attempted to
do, provide the world with the history of the Gulag based on the combination of
eyewitness accounts and archival records. What is more impressive is her
versatility in writing. She is a Pulitzer Prize winning author who has not
stopped at simply writing books or writing for newspapers. Applebaum uses technology to reach a wide variety of people by writing in various blogs on the web. During the political conflict in Libya she kept us informed through The Washington Post. After the death of Osama Bin Laden she chided us for our conformity and urged us to stay informed. In her website she
has articles dating back to 1996 when she was beginning her research
for her books. Her life’s work spans decades of dedication to bringing the
general public insight into unknown territory. Applebaum sets an ideal example of how we shoud eliminate injustice around the world, we need not to look away wherever human rights violations are occurring we must act with the resources that are available to us.
You bring seriousness of purpose and good historical information to your task. Through your portrait of Applebaum, we see why studying history matters.
ReplyDeleteI read her Bin Laden piece. I didn't find it to have much focus and I wasn't sure of her central message. I guess that can happen when you write on deadline for news sites.